Rank | Player | Team | G | Rushes | Yards | TD | Rec | Yards | TD | MVP Score |
1 | Maurice Jones-Drew | JAC | 6 | 108 | 463 | 8 | 26 | 165 | 0 | 388 |
2 | Ray Rice | BAL | 6 | 73 | 441 | 3 | 33 | 325 | 1 | 384 |
3 | Adrian Peterson | MIN | 6 | 121 | 624 | 7 | 14 | 85 | 0 | 380 |
4 | Chris Johnson | TEN | 6 | 95 | 596 | 2 | 16 | 126 | 1 | 328 |
5 | Ronnie Brown | MIA | 5 | 93 | 443 | 6 | 9 | 64 | 0 | 320 |
6 | Thomas Jones | NYJ | 6 | 96 | 481 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 316 |
7 | Cedric Benson | CIN | 6 | 127 | 531 | 4 | 10 | 66 | 0 | 316 |
8 | Ahmad Bradshaw | NYG | 6 | 68 | 423 | 3 | 6 | 74 | 0 | 256 |
9 | Kevin Smith | DET | 6 | 109 | 348 | 3 | 20 | 149 | 0 | 236 |
10 | DeAngelo Williams | CAR | 5 | 89 | 372 | 4 | 13 | 123 | 0 | 236 |
11 | Fred Jackson | BUF | 6 | 98 | 415 | 0 | 20 | 177 | 1 | 236 |
12 | Ricky Williams | MIA | 5 | 61 | 316 | 2 | 11 | 132 | 1 | 236 |
13 | Steven Jackson | STL | 6 | 120 | 501 | 0 | 20 | 170 | 0 | 228 |
14 | Michael Turner | ATL | 5 | 100 | 353 | 6 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 228 |
15 | Willis McGahee | BAL | 6 | 45 | 202 | 5 | 8 | 58 | 2 | 224 |
16 | Rashard Mendenhall | PIT | 6 | 68 | 349 | 4 | 7 | 70 | 0 | 224 |
17 | Steve Slaton | HOU | 6 | 91 | 274 | 1 | 23 | 282 | 2 | 220 |
18 | Clinton Portis | WAS | 6 | 106 | 447 | 1 | 9 | 57 | 1 | 220 |
19 | Joseph Addai | IND | 5 | 62 | 210 | 3 | 26 | 153 | 1 | 204 |
20 | Carnell Williams | TB | 6 | 64 | 276 | 2 | 15 | 89 | 1 | 204 |
21 | Julius Jones | SEA | 6 | 74 | 290 | 1 | 12 | 67 | 2 | 200 |
22 | Marion Barber | DAL | 4 | 58 | 297 | 3 | 4 | 58 | 0 | 200 |
I'm showing receiving stats for running backs since they are just as important as rushing stats. Some might argue that Adrian Peterson should be ranked first with his league-leading 624 yards together with his 7 rushing TDs but he doesn't have much production as a receiver.
You'll also notice that the top running back is still ranked behind eight QBs. My formulas doesn't devalue RBs - it's just that there have been more quarterbacks that have played well.
My formulas usually produce MVP candidates around a score of 1000 by year's end. At the moment, there are more than ten QBs that would exceed that at their current rate - some looking at a score of 1400. We'll see how that plays out.
No comments:
Post a Comment